12 · Myths

Infrasound and health

The "fear frequency", wind turbines, "Havana syndrome" — where the science is, and where the urban legend.

Library → Infrasound and health

A cloud of scare stories has grown up around infrasound: that it supposedly causes panic, illness and even serves as a "sonic weapon". Let's sort it out calmly and by the sources — separating the verified from the invented.

Myth 1. The 19 Hz "fear frequency"

A popular story claims that infrasound around 19 Hz causes groundless terror and "the sense of a ghost". It rests on isolated anecdotal observations (the famous case of an engineer in a "haunted" laboratory) and a couple of small experiments. There is no rigorous, reproducible evidence of a universal "fear frequency". Strong infrasound can be felt by the body, but science has found no "panic button" in it. Peer-reviewed reviews of hearing at low frequencies show something else: infrasound is not an "invisible poison" — the hearing threshold simply rises sharply as frequency drops, and at sufficient loudness a person perceives it in the ordinary way, by ear.5

Myth 2. Wind turbines "poison" with infrasound

This is the most studied topic. Several critical reviews of the peer-reviewed literature conclude: there is no reliable evidence of direct harm to health from wind-turbine infrasound at real-world levels.12 The discomfort experienced by some people is real, but it is more strongly linked to audible noise and attitudes toward the installation than to infrasound itself. Controlled experiments show directly that health complaints near wind turbines are best explained by the nocebo (negative-expectation) effect rather than by infrasound itself (Crichton et al., 2014).6

Myth 3. "Havana syndrome" — an infrasound attack

When diplomats in Havana developed ailments, one of the theories was a "sonic weapon". Scientific analysis did not confirm it: the report of the JASON advisory group ruled out, with high confidence, sound exposure (infra-, audible and ultrasound) at a distance as the cause.3 And the mysterious "recordings of the attack" matched, spectrally, the song of a Caribbean cricket.4

What is true

Infrasound is not "death rays" but a natural part of the environment: it is constantly around us (the ocean, the wind, traffic) at safe levels. It is worth studying not out of fear but for benefit — early warning of real threats.

Did you know?
Why this matters for HERD

We use infrasound as a source of information, not of exposure: we listen to the planet in order to warn. Debunking myths is part of an honest conversation with our audience and with scientific sceptics.

Sources for this article

  1. review van Kamp I., van den Berg F. (2018). Health effects related to wind turbine sound and infrasound. Acoustics Australia 46. springer.com
  2. review McCunney R.J. et al. (2014). Wind turbines and health: a critical review of the scientific literature. JOEM 56(11). journals.lww.com
  3. rebuttalorganization JASON/MITRE (2018). Analysis related to the Embassy Incidents (Havana syndrome). int.nyt.com
  4. peer-reviewedrebuttal Stubbs A.L., Montealegre-Z F. (2019). 'Sonic attacks' in Cuba match a cricket's calling song. bioRxiv. biorxiv.org
  5. peer-reviewedreview Møller H., Pedersen C.S. (2004). Hearing at low and infrasonic frequencies. Noise & Health 6(23). pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
  6. peer-reviewed Crichton F. et al. (2014). Health complaints and wind turbines: the nocebo expectations hypothesis. Front. Public Health 2:220. doi.org
  7. history Tandy V., Lawrence T.R. (1998). The ghost in the machine. J. Soc. Psychical Research 62. richardwiseman.com